Filter the index on what actually matters.
Every AI builder in the Trustgent index is described against four axes: what they build, who they build it for, how they engage, and which regulatory regimes their delivery has been verified against. The chips below are the working set. Each one is a search facet, not a category wall.
Most buyers come to Trustgent with a known capability and a regulatory constraint, and need the intersection — “RAG builders verified for GDPR”, “document-understanding shops verified for HIPAA”. Click any chip to start the filter; combine more in the index header.
Working set v0 · 35 terms · canonical taxonomy locks at B2-taxonomy.
What providers build. Each capability is a class of system, not a tool. Click to see verified builders.
- Generative AI & RAG
- AI agents & automation
- MLOps & evaluation
- Computer vision
- Document understanding
- Voice & conversational AI
- AI strategy & advisory
- Data engineering for AI
- Custom model fine-tuning
- AI governance & compliance
Capabilities are claimable at L1 and cross-referenced at L2. An AI-analyzed (L4) project tagged to a capability is what separates “they say they build it” from “they have shipped it”.
Sectors providers have shipped to. Four sectors have dedicated buyer landings; the rest filter as search facets.
How providers contract for AI builds. The model usually correlates with budget band and timeline.
Regulatory regimes against which a provider's delivery has been verified. Each flag is a Trustgent-verified attribute, not a provider self-claim.
Regulatory flags are verified provider attributes, not self-claims. A provider must reach L2 (cross-referenced) or higher for a flag to display on their profile.
The taxonomy is the filter. Verification is the ranking.
Once you filter the index on a capability, industry, or regulatory regime, providers are ranked by their highest verification level (L5 outcome-verified → L1 claimed) and recency. A free-plan L5 provider always ranks above a paid-plan L1 provider. Always.